Der Michel Posted Saturday at 04:24 PM Posted Saturday at 04:24 PM (edited) Following is wrong for the VD. a.) the vertical line at the end of the scale has to be solid, not dashed. Dashed it's only, when ND has ARC greater 160 or ROSE greater 320. b.) vertical MORA line has to be horizontal aligned with 0 range line c) if the constrained is missed, the constrain symbol has to be amber with an dotted line: d) if alt constraint is ignored, it has to be white in the VD: 1. empty FMS: VIEW ALONG ACFT TRK is missing Aircraft should be at the bottom of the VD no green arrow would be correct, as no f-pln avail currently MORA is missing if SIM DEFAULT is used, but NAVIGRAPH is linked RADIO HEIGHT indication is missing 2. citypair/route entered FMS: MAGENTA AREA missing...distance to airport reference coordinate GREY AREA for the remaining VD RADIO HEIGHT indication is missing Aircraft should be at the bottom of the VD 3. runway and SID entered FMS, but no perf data avail: MAGENTA AREA missing...distance to RWY TRESHOLD coordinate GREY AREA for the remaining VD RUNWAY missing RADIO HEIGHT indication is missing Aircraft should be at the bottom of the VD green arrow should still be indicated, because no predictions are avail 4. runway and SID entered FMS, but perf data now avail: MAGENTA AREA missing...distance to RWY TRESHOLD coordinate GREY AREA for the remaining VD RUNWAY missing RADIO HEIGHT indication is missing green arrow should still be indicated, because aircraft does not follow the FMS trajectory or the selected trajectory vertical profile has to start at the calculated takeoff point In selected mode the VD is not showing the Vertical Cut along the TRACK and should show the selected vertical track not the arrow. Edited Sunday at 10:54 AM by Der Michel Specs: CPU-13900K, RAM-64GB-6800, GPU-4090
Farlis Posted Saturday at 05:16 PM Posted Saturday at 05:16 PM This one I'm not so sure of Michel. Visual differences can often come down to different software suites in the aircraft modeled. I would be hard pressed to believe that the artists at IniBuilds would not be able to draw a dashed line when their reference material tells them to do so. So I assume that the aircraft they based that appearance on is using a different version of the software and is drawing these differently than the ones you work on.
Der Michel Posted Saturday at 06:15 PM Author Posted Saturday at 06:15 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, Farlis said: This one I'm not so sure of Michel. Visual differences can often come down to different software suites in the aircraft modeled. I would be hard pressed to believe that the artists at IniBuilds would not be able to draw a dashed line when their reference material tells them to do so. So I assume that the aircraft they based that appearance on is using a different version of the software and is drawing these differently than the ones you work on. Might be yes, but believe me, system devs can forget, miss or just shortcut a lot. And they did it correct for the red version: Edited Saturday at 06:32 PM by Der Michel Specs: CPU-13900K, RAM-64GB-6800, GPU-4090
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now