bug v1.0.12 Calculated descent path logic still needs work

[dectenor1]

The calculated descent path logic still needs work.

There is absolutely no need for the aircraft to be planning to descend below the altitude constraint here at PRN25.

If the aircraft needed to slow down, then it is possible it would be above an AT constraint, but there is no need for the aircraft to descend lower.

[Der Michel]

Yep. Appr VNAV is totally bugged.

[dectenor1]

54 minutes ago, Der Michel said:

Yep. Appr VNAV is totally bugged.

Yep, again here, absolutely no reason for it to want to be so low at IZS38.

And it thinks it can get to the (incorrect) altitude by losing 2600ft and slowing down in 6nm... Just borked.

 

One can also see here that the time predications are messed up for the FLAP pseudo-waypoints.

Bit of a mess really.