1.0.12 vs Actual footage - Auto De-rotation rate is still too fast and aggressive?

[cvn]

 

Hello, from multiple footages below, it seems inibuilds's auto de-rotate still seems way more aggressive (much faster nose drop). While I understand the real footages are landed by trained A350 pilots by comparison, but I still feel Inibuilds's modelling is too much on the nose drop, which often felt more like a crashing the nose onto the runway and many times it will bounces back up.

I really hope Inibuilds and its panel of experts could help review (re-review) or enlighten on the basis used for the modelling of it auto de-rotate rate please?

Inibuilds 1.0.12 

 

Real Footages multiple landings (e.g., from 3:34/ 7:54/ 10:50/ 12;12...)

 

[starjun]

Took average of 6 or more seconds from these landings, from main gear touchdown to nose gear. Actual landing were surprisingly slow, gentle and seems partially controlled by pilot?

[cvn]

The nose hardly stayed up more than 3 seconds. I thought the feature is to prevent the hard nose touch down (which seems the case in the real A350 touch down). But for inibuilds, it is the other way around as I feel it is to prevent a gentle or smooth nose gear touch down instead, and with no further effect with the side stick once the main gear touches it just forces your nose gear down in 2-3 seconds max...contrary to the slow, gentle nose touchdown in the real videos on YouTube.

But I would really welcome anyone who can replicate the kind of slow gentle nose touchdown seen in these real landing footages, to pose here if it is the landing technique or maybe the modelling by inibuilds needing more changes?

Edited 13 hours ago by cvn