Der Michel Posted Saturday at 12:30 PM Posted Saturday at 12:30 PM There is a problem, how NPA are indicated in the F-PLN. If there is no runway coded in the final approach...there shouldn't be any in the F-PLN! Explanation with JEP Data below: Some examples: EDDV27R with NDB approach. For now ignore the non blue GA part, that is covered in another report. Also the wrong display of CA/FA/CD legs is in another topic covered. MQ27R is the MAP before RWY. In the NAVDATA it is coded as that: What you see, there is no RWY coded! So in F-PLN there shouldn't be any EEDV27R! Other IRL example: VVTS07L VOR approach MA07L is the MAP before RWY and coded: The interesting thing is, that the blue GA line at the ND starts directly at the MAP!!! Picture is from older AIRAC, so different names. Another Example where the MAP is on the RWY! There RW28 is the MAP and coded as: The MAP RW28 is in this case indicated as WARR28 ! And now just an ILS appr to compare. From EDDV27R
Eddie Posted Saturday at 01:33 PM Posted Saturday at 01:33 PM Hello, Thank you, forwarded to the team. EddieCommunity Manager IniBuilds Ltd. | inibuilds.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now