A350: all my appreciation (unpopular post)

[erti]

Thanks Ini for your job….

Ok, the software is not perfect and has some bugs and lot of things can and sure will be enhanced but….

On my old system (2080ti) on msfs2024 is working great with great performances (40 fps in vr for the non-cabin version). Looks like many of that the people call bugs of the software are caused by their hardware/software combinations.

The depth of the systems is great (It would be nice to have random failures and I hope your will implement them asap).

I want to tell a thing about the flight model…. Despite I use flight sim for almost 40 years and despite I work in aviation since more then 20 ( many years on airbus as well)….I don’t know how much is good or not…. Why? Because I’m not a 350 rated pilot, and I never flown neither as passenger on A350, but I trust what you said…..

I mean….. for all the people complaining about the flight model… An aircraft does not fly like you think or hope or like it should fly…. Except if you are a rated pilot on that type!!!!!

About the sound from the cockpit… see above the same thing about the flight model.

So, hoping you will keep improving this plane.

I tell you thanks a lot.

 

 

Edited March 5 by erti

[Atul]

I think it's refreshing to see such post. Ini certainly needs some more encouragement as they've basically made our dream of flying Airbus long hauler true in many many instances. With regards to some other issues during flight (except for freezing things or CTD), I guess we all can consider those as random in-flight challenges until they get fixed (where required in reference to the real world counterpart) and bring the bird down safely. With regards to the flight model, guess everyone is expecting A350 to feel as heavy as 777, etc. or even the A330. I guess that's a very normal expectation perhaps. I too was amused hearing on their stream that the A350 is the most sensitive Airbus with regards to control sensitivity. 

Originally, I did have quite a few issues having the navdata updated, etc. which required me some 5-6 re-installations but finally it was there, and a couple with autopilot. There's always a thing called "product maturity" in product development & manufacturing even after the first production and I believe it implies to softwares as well. Especially considering hundreds of hardware combinations that exist in the world today (+ personalized system settings that are not default) unlike prior to 2010s, it can get challenging to make a software work on all those combinations and tweaks, etc.