Everything posted by ClaasKrause
-
A350 Shared Cockpit
sounds interesting. will this technology enable remote control of some units (OIS or MCDU) via a browser / iPad?
-
Remote MCDU for iPad (via Browser) for A340 / A350 like the Fenix Airbus versions have ...
Hey dear team, First off — holy wow. The A350 performance boost in SU4 is insane. I genuinely didn’t expect a heavy, systems-rich airliner to run this smoothly, but you absolutely nailed it. Huge kudos! Since you clearly have some magic going on under the hood: like many simmers, I’ve got the Winwing MCDU, and once you get used to using a real hardware CDU, it’s hard to fly without it. It would be amazing if the A350 MCDU and/or EFB supported external access — e.g., via an iPad or a web interface. Please please ... If you could add native remote MCDU/EFB support, that would take the A350 to the next level and really justify the premium tier. 😉 Thanks for all the hard work!
-
WinWing systems supported
the FCU + EFIS (L+R) are working seamlessly at the moment which is nice.
-
Remote MCDU for iPad (via Browser) for A340 / A350 like the Fenix Airbus versions have ...
Dear iniBuilds, I hope you’re doing great! I wanted to ask whether you might consider implementing a feature similar to the Fenix aircraft, where the MCDU and EFB can be accessed via a web browser. It’s such a fantastic way to use an iPad or phone during flight, and it would be amazing to have something like this in your aircraft — ideally sooner rather than later. I know there are some third-party web remote workarounds, but having an official and properly styled implementation would really elevate the experience. It shouldn’t be too difficult to add, right? 😉 Also, considering your aircraft are priced a bit higher than Fenix’s, this feature would feel like a very fair addition. Thank you so much for your great work and dedication — and warm regards, Claas P.S. I’m about to buy the A340 after already owning the A350. I haven’t been completely happy with the A350 yet, but from what I’ve heard, the A340 performs better and has prettier / improved textures. Let’s see!
-
MCDU handles STARS or SIDs weirdly w TRK79 or similar 3000NM away waypoints and jagged arrivals (msfs24 mainly since SU4 beta)
Dear team, I heard about this problem on several occasions online, some have it more with the Airbus A330 RR, I didn’t have it at all in August. Since SU4 beta in 9/10 flights. Can I be sure these problems don’t exist in the ‘premium’ A350 / A340? In MSFS2024 In the inibuilds airbus mcdu… whenever I type in an approach and Runway STAR everything seems ok in the flight plan but one waypoint is waaay off and like 3000nm elsewhere and the arrival onto the runway is jagged. sometimes it says trk79 … what kind of bug is this? it looked new / never encountered it since sim update 4 any updates on this? makes the game unplayable and up until now I didn’t have to think of the Fenix thanks, warm regards, Claas
-
Problems w MCDU FPlan since Sim Update 4 w Navigraph (Airbus A320Neo, A321LRneo ... etc.)
apparently the problem is non existent with SU3 ... what do you guys think, will they be able to eliminate the issue with the proper SU4 release? and when is this due? thanks
-
Problems w MCDU FPlan since Sim Update 4 w Navigraph (Airbus A320Neo, A321LRneo ... etc.)
thank you for the quick answer ... It's the paid and most recent version of SimBrief. I deinstalled the whole Simulator and will try it now again wihtout the Sim Update 4 and update the post in case other users encountered the same problems.
-
Problems w MCDU FPlan since Sim Update 4 w Navigraph (Airbus A320Neo, A321LRneo ... etc.)
Dear community, I hope you’re having a great day. I’m not sure if you’ve encountered the same issues, but since Sim Update 4 (latest beta, as of Monday, October 6), I’ve been running into the following problem: I create my flight plan as usual with SimBrief Dispatch and then load it into the MCDU of the Airbus A320neo. This first rough plan looks quite ok. (I always check with the plan-view mode in the MCDU) However, when I add the SID or STAR corresponding to the selected runway, the system inserts some extremely odd waypoints—sometimes 3,000 NM or even 31,000 NM away—which also cause the approach to the final runway to appear at an unnaturally sharp angle. EDIT: It's the paid and most recent version of SimBrief with the respective AIRAC cycle. I’ve already reinstalled the SimBrief EFB, updated all aircraft in MSFS, and refreshed the terrain data. I suppose it’s quite difficult to downgrade back to SU3. I might try a clean reinstall next. Did any of you encounter the same problem? Thanks a lot, warm regards, Claas