ClaasKrause

do you use say intentions / have a subscription?

Hi dear iniBuilds team, first of all: huge props for the SU4 performance improvements on the A350. The gains in smoothness and stability are very noticeable, especially on longer sectors and in complex scenery. It’s clear a lot of deep, unglamorous work went into that, and it really shows. Now that performance has taken such a solid step forward, I’d like to suggest two features that would meaningfully push immersion and workflow realism to the next level, especially for users with more advanced setups. 1) Physical Printer Support (POS 80 / similar) Support for a physical cockpit printer (e.g. POS 80–style thermal printers) would be a fantastic addition. Use cases: ATIS printouts OFP / loadsheet Weather and route revisions Clearances or operational notes Several aircraft already show how powerful this can be for immersion, and the A350—with its strong procedural focus—would benefit enormously from it. 2) Remote KCCU / OIS (Tablet / Browser / Networked Device) A remote KCCU / OIS interface, similar in concept to what Fenix or FSLabs offer, would be a major quality-of-life improvement. Potential benefits: Entering FMGS data from a tablet via a browser Interacting with the OIS (charts, performance, documents) outside the main sim view Cleaner workflows for users without perfect mouse access to the cockpit Given the A350’s real-world architecture (KCCU + CDS + OIS), a remote implementation feels both technically appropriate and highly immersive. Why now? With SU4, the aircraft feels like it has reached a performance baseline where deeper interaction features become viable without compromising stability. These two additions would not just be “nice extras,” but meaningful steps toward a more complete, modern long-haul simulation environment. Thanks again for the work you’ve done so far — the A350 is already an impressive piece of engineering. I hope you’ll consider these ideas for a future update. Best regards, thanks, Claas

Dear iniBuilds Team, Hope you’re all doing well! I just wanted to say how much I’m enjoying your aircraft right now—especially after the huge performance boost you delivered for both the A350 and A340. They were already smooth, but the latest updates really took things to the next level in MSFS 2024. I’m a big fan of using CPDLC, PDC, and all the related datalink features, so I wanted to ask: Do you have plans to add physical printer support in the near future? Fenix and FSLabs have had this for quite a while, so I’m hoping it might be on your roadmap as well. I even picked up a POS-80 (Epson) thermal printer specifically to use with your aircraft—would love to get it rolling soon! Thanks a lot for your amazing work, and warm regards, Claas

sounds interesting. will this technology enable remote control of some units (OIS or MCDU) via a browser / iPad?

Hey dear team, First off — holy wow. The A350 performance boost in SU4 is insane. I genuinely didn’t expect a heavy, systems-rich airliner to run this smoothly, but you absolutely nailed it. Huge kudos! Since you clearly have some magic going on under the hood: like many simmers, I’ve got the Winwing MCDU, and once you get used to using a real hardware CDU, it’s hard to fly without it. It would be amazing if the A350 MCDU and/or EFB supported external access — e.g., via an iPad or a web interface. Please please ... If you could add native remote MCDU/EFB support, that would take the A350 to the next level and really justify the premium tier. 😉 Thanks for all the hard work!

the FCU + EFIS (L+R) are working seamlessly at the moment which is nice.

Dear iniBuilds, I hope you’re doing great! I wanted to ask whether you might consider implementing a feature similar to the Fenix aircraft, where the MCDU and EFB can be accessed via a web browser. It’s such a fantastic way to use an iPad or phone during flight, and it would be amazing to have something like this in your aircraft — ideally sooner rather than later. I know there are some third-party web remote workarounds, but having an official and properly styled implementation would really elevate the experience. It shouldn’t be too difficult to add, right? 😉 Also, considering your aircraft are priced a bit higher than Fenix’s, this feature would feel like a very fair addition. Thank you so much for your great work and dedication — and warm regards, Claas P.S. I’m about to buy the A340 after already owning the A350. I haven’t been completely happy with the A350 yet, but from what I’ve heard, the A340 performs better and has prettier / improved textures. Let’s see!

Dear team, I heard about this problem on several occasions online, some have it more with the Airbus A330 RR, I didn’t have it at all in August. Since SU4 beta in 9/10 flights. Can I be sure these problems don’t exist in the ‘premium’ A350 / A340? In MSFS2024 In the inibuilds airbus mcdu… whenever I type in an approach and Runway STAR everything seems ok in the flight plan but one waypoint is waaay off and like 3000nm elsewhere and the arrival onto the runway is jagged. sometimes it says trk79 … what kind of bug is this? it looked new / never encountered it since sim update 4 any updates on this? makes the game unplayable and up until now I didn’t have to think of the Fenix thanks, warm regards, Claas

apparently the problem is non existent with SU3 ... what do you guys think, will they be able to eliminate the issue with the proper SU4 release? and when is this due? thanks

thank you for the quick answer ... It's the paid and most recent version of SimBrief. I deinstalled the whole Simulator and will try it now again wihtout the Sim Update 4 and update the post in case other users encountered the same problems.

Dear community, I hope you’re having a great day. I’m not sure if you’ve encountered the same issues, but since Sim Update 4 (latest beta, as of Monday, October 6), I’ve been running into the following problem: I create my flight plan as usual with SimBrief Dispatch and then load it into the MCDU of the Airbus A320neo. This first rough plan looks quite ok. (I always check with the plan-view mode in the MCDU) However, when I add the SID or STAR corresponding to the selected runway, the system inserts some extremely odd waypoints—sometimes 3,000 NM or even 31,000 NM away—which also cause the approach to the final runway to appear at an unnaturally sharp angle. EDIT: It's the paid and most recent version of SimBrief with the respective AIRAC cycle. I’ve already reinstalled the SimBrief EFB, updated all aircraft in MSFS, and refreshed the terrain data. I suppose it’s quite difficult to downgrade back to SU3. I might try a clean reinstall next. Did any of you encounter the same problem? Thanks a lot, warm regards, Claas