ClaasKrause

it would be nice to get a paid "Enhanced" upgrade for the default iniBuilds A330. iirc this wouldn´t bother microsoft?

Apparently the event-codes for the KCCU (350 MCDU) have changed? the always perfectly working stream deck profile doesn´t respond for the letter buttons and numerals and FPLAN / PERF / etc. ... did you change these?

hmm ok ...

in the end - I think we should get a web UI via a http:// - link for the A359 KCCU ... (MCDU) ... like Fenix and FSLabs have ... and these are smaller companies! and ... a lot of dedicated simmers who can afford it have the winwing mcdu, but especially for the A359 there is a greater need for peripheral access to it ... please please

This would be HUGE. Being able to use the Winwing MCDU, FCU and EFIS properly with the default iniBuilds / Microsoft A320 and A330 would be an absolute game-changer. Win Ctrl (when will we get used to that haha) says they’re working on it, so fingers crossed 🤞

will any deviations from this given procedure as kindly written down by PassengerFlight (I prefer disabling gsx-remote-control as well) result in the 1 Pax error?

ah interesting ... are such mobiflight profiles to be found on flightsim.to? recently I had the problem that mobiflight won´t recognize my winctrl hardware so I had to count on simapp pro itself ... THANK YOU! Looking forward what the team says 🙂

would be too cool ...

Dear community, hope you’re all having a great day. I usually prefer to disable the GSX Remote Control, as I actually enjoy using the GSX toolbar in-sim a bit more. Also, the flashing orange indicator in the OIS was starting to get a bit nerve-wracking. However, since doing this I keep running into an issue where GSX only detects 1 passenger, even though my SimBrief flight plan shows the correct (and much higher) pax count. My ideal workflow would be: – set fuel to instant via the aircraft / EFB – then load passengers progressively via GSX Has anyone found a reliable way to do this with the iniBuilds A350 in MSFS 2024? Or is this a known limitation / bug when the GSX Remote is disabled? Would love to hear how others are handling this. Thanks a lot and warm regards, Claas

do you use say intentions / have a subscription?

Hi dear iniBuilds team, first of all: huge props for the SU4 performance improvements on the A350. The gains in smoothness and stability are very noticeable, especially on longer sectors and in complex scenery. It’s clear a lot of deep, unglamorous work went into that, and it really shows. Now that performance has taken such a solid step forward, I’d like to suggest two features that would meaningfully push immersion and workflow realism to the next level, especially for users with more advanced setups. 1) Physical Printer Support (POS 80 / similar) Support for a physical cockpit printer (e.g. POS 80–style thermal printers) would be a fantastic addition. Use cases: ATIS printouts OFP / loadsheet Weather and route revisions Clearances or operational notes Several aircraft already show how powerful this can be for immersion, and the A350—with its strong procedural focus—would benefit enormously from it. 2) Remote KCCU / OIS (Tablet / Browser / Networked Device) A remote KCCU / OIS interface, similar in concept to what Fenix or FSLabs offer, would be a major quality-of-life improvement. Potential benefits: Entering FMGS data from a tablet via a browser Interacting with the OIS (charts, performance, documents) outside the main sim view Cleaner workflows for users without perfect mouse access to the cockpit Given the A350’s real-world architecture (KCCU + CDS + OIS), a remote implementation feels both technically appropriate and highly immersive. Why now? With SU4, the aircraft feels like it has reached a performance baseline where deeper interaction features become viable without compromising stability. These two additions would not just be “nice extras,” but meaningful steps toward a more complete, modern long-haul simulation environment. Thanks again for the work you’ve done so far — the A350 is already an impressive piece of engineering. I hope you’ll consider these ideas for a future update. Best regards, thanks, Claas

Dear iniBuilds Team, Hope you’re all doing well! I just wanted to say how much I’m enjoying your aircraft right now—especially after the huge performance boost you delivered for both the A350 and A340. They were already smooth, but the latest updates really took things to the next level in MSFS 2024. I’m a big fan of using CPDLC, PDC, and all the related datalink features, so I wanted to ask: Do you have plans to add physical printer support in the near future? Fenix and FSLabs have had this for quite a while, so I’m hoping it might be on your roadmap as well. I even picked up a POS-80 (Epson) thermal printer specifically to use with your aircraft—would love to get it rolling soon! Thanks a lot for your amazing work, and warm regards, Claas

sounds interesting. will this technology enable remote control of some units (OIS or MCDU) via a browser / iPad?

Hey dear team, First off — holy wow. The A350 performance boost in SU4 is insane. I genuinely didn’t expect a heavy, systems-rich airliner to run this smoothly, but you absolutely nailed it. Huge kudos! Since you clearly have some magic going on under the hood: like many simmers, I’ve got the Winwing MCDU, and once you get used to using a real hardware CDU, it’s hard to fly without it. It would be amazing if the A350 MCDU and/or EFB supported external access — e.g., via an iPad or a web interface. Please please ... If you could add native remote MCDU/EFB support, that would take the A350 to the next level and really justify the premium tier. 😉 Thanks for all the hard work!

the FCU + EFIS (L+R) are working seamlessly at the moment which is nice.