Andrei Abraham

Hi, do you encounter this issue at one particular airport? If so, that might be a problem with the scenery. Some of the sceneries have a problem with these invisible obstacles or simply a terrain problem. Also, are using any controllers/throttle quadrants? That or even some wrong configured controller profiles might cause the parking brake to set. So go on your control settings and search for the parking brake controls to see what keys are binded to it

I agree and apart from that the IAF for both runways are appearing to be somewhere around 3000NM away. But this issue is not related to the A320 itself, it’s a navdata issue. If you’re on PC you can use navigraph database to fix this, if you’re on Xbox there is no fix atm

Hmm, I’ll have a look into it as this is quite interesting. I’m curious what other factors can affect the pitch in cruise as well. As per your statement. The lead developer of the A20N from iniBuilds is a real A320 type rated that flies both NEO and the CEO daily so I guess they’re fine with real pilot inputs on this project

Nothing wrong with it. I assume you’re flying a low cost index.The airplane in the picture you used for comparison is likely flying with a higher cost index NOTE: Payload affects your CG so that can be a cause too

Hmm it’s strange, I’ve never encountered that. Maybe a short video or a screenshot will help me understand exactly what’s wrong and help you out😊

Did you insert it in this format? Ex: EGGW/EGPH

Also, forgot to mention the wipers. Wipers should stop automatically at 230 knots

So far the aircraft performs well but there are some minor adjustments that could be done. ND - Shows all the airports within the range selected. It shouldn’t show the airfields with short runways. It’s just a clutter of airports VORs are displayed in blue but they should show up in magenta NavAids - When intercepting a speed constraint the aircraft behaves well but soon as it decelerates to the speed restriction it accelerates back to the previous speed and after a few seconds goes back to the constraint speed When selecting any STARs at EGPF there seems to be a problem with the final approach fixes. CF23 and SF23 as well for the opposite runway 05 seem to be like 3000NM away from the airfield. I’m not sure if this is an A320 related issue or airport issue but it doesn’t happen in the PMDG 737 nor the Fenix The aircraft can’t perform VOR approaches. It will just fly past the intercept point even though the VOR approach is selected in the MCDU and the identifier is correctly set up in the RAD/NAV page

Nope, I can’t even input the flight ID into the CPDLC. But I’m guessing it’s pointless to use it on the Xbox anyway as hoppie was made for VATSIM use. I’ve read on the hoppie website that you can still use the CPDLC offline to get ATIS info but since there’s no real ATC on the Xbox is kinda useless to have it on the A300. Anyway, I am using PC as well and there it works perfectly. Just keeping my Xbox for when I’m going away as it prevents me from getting bored😂

Hi, just a quick question I can see in this update that CPDLC is available for the Xbox version too. Is it working? I’ve created a hoppie account and put the logon code in the EFB but I can’t get it to work… Many thanks, Andrei

The reason for this is crosswind which is accurately simulated in MSFS. I guarantee, every plane does this in the sim and real life. The stronger the wind, the harder the veer. It’s quite simple to maintain the centerline by using the rudder. Or you can activate takeoff assistance in the assistance options inside MSFS and this will get you rid of that veering

Not a single one😘If it’s hard to believe listen to this as well. Not a single CTD on any third party airport either. And other news, better performance than what I get on the default 787 and 747 after the avionics update. So have a sit for while you wait for me to care if you believe it or not

I can guarantee that most of the beta testers didn’t get a single CTD on Xbox like MS claims. Go find yourself on the MSFS official forum They’ve had a newer version of the A320 ready to release for the yesterday beta update patch as the initial version was a few builds behind. So, instead of releasing the new patch for the A320 and see how it works, they decide to remove it from the beta before the testing period is even over. The release date for SU14 is gonna be on the 5th of December as we are all aware.

I’m sorry but the aircraft ran better on both platforms than any other addon so far. Yes it had bugs but thinking it was on the beta it makes sense since it wasn’t the final version. And also, why remove it before the actual SU14 release?

Same here, like I’ve mentioned above. Came off the beta , done a flight with the PMDG 737 and I get black gauges and CTD after at EIDW, airport I would never get any CTD in the a320 ( Xbox X series). This whole “we’ll release it in a few months after we fix some optimisation issues” is total b*******. Now I actually believe FBW are being right about those allegations and I guess we’ll have to wait those few months until they’ll redo the aircraft. Again, Microsoft are outrageous by promising something and not delivering it